Publication:
Clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4a27350f-3e6b-4727-83d5-66c789fad911
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorSabaté, Manel
dc.contributor.authorBrugaletta, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorCequier, Angel
dc.contributor.authorIñiguez, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Quevedo, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorMainar, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorCampo, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorTespili, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorden Heijer, Peter
dc.contributor.authorBethencourt, Armando
dc.contributor.authorVazquez, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorvan Es, Gerrit Anne
dc.contributor.authorBackx, Bianca
dc.contributor.authorValgimigli, Marco
dc.contributor.authorSerruys, Patrick W
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T18:55:14Z
dc.date.available2024-10-24T18:55:14Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Data for the safety and efficacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents at long-term follow-up, and specifically in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, are scarce. In the EXAMINATION trial, we compared everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) in an all-comer population with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the 5-year outcomes of the population in the EXAMINATION trial. METHODS In the multicentre EXAMINATION trial, done in Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EES or BMS. The random allocation schedule was computer-generated and central randomisation (by telephone) was used to allocate patients in blocks of four or six, stratified by centre. Patients were masked to treatment assignment. At 5 years, we assessed the combined patient-oriented outcome of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00828087. FINDINGS 1498 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES (n=751) or BMS (n=747). At 5 years, complete clinical follow-up data were obtained for 731 patients treated with EES and 727 treated with BMS (97% of both groups). The patient-oriented endpoint occurred in 159 (21%) patients in the EES group versus 192 (26%) in the BMS group (hazard ratio 0·80, 95% CI 0·65-0·98; p=0·033). This difference was mainly driven by a reduced rate of all-cause mortality (65 [9%] vs 88 [12%]; 0·72, 0·52-0·10; p=0·047). INTERPRETATION Our findings should be taken as a point of reference for the assessment of new bioresorbable polymer-based metallic stents or bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. FUNDING Spanish Heart Foundation.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.92887
dc.identifier.pmid26520230
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00548-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/147990
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofLancet
dc.relation.issn0140-6736
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Cardiology
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleClinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with everolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (EXAMINATION): 5-year results of a randomised trial.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage366
oaire.citation.issue10016
oaire.citation.startPage357
oaire.citation.volume387
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId92887
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleLANCET
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0140673615005486-main.pdf
Size:
507.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections