Implant Disease Risk Assessment IDRA-a tool for preventing peri-implant disease.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
32003037
Description
OBJECTIVE
This treatment concept paper introduces a risk assessment tool, the Implant Disease Risk Assessment, (IDRA) which estimates the risk for a patient to develop peri-implantitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The functional risk assessment diagram was constructed incorporating eight parameters, each with documented evidence for an association with peri-implantitis.
RESULTS
The eight vectors of the diagram include (1) assessment of a history of periodontitis (2) percentage of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP) (3) number of teeth/implants with probing depths (PD) ≥5 mm (4) the ratio of periodontal bone loss (evaluated from a radiograph) divided by the patient's age (5) periodontitis susceptibility as described by the staging and grading categories from the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (Journal of Periodontology, 89 Suppl 1, S159-S172, 2018) (6) the frequency/compliance with supportive periodontal therapy (7) the distance in mm from the restorative margin of the implant-supported prosthesis to the marginal bone crest and (8) prosthesis-related factors including cleanability and fit of the implant-supported prosthesis.
CONCLUSION
The combination of these factors in a risk assessment tool, IDRA, may be useful in identifying individuals at risk for development of peri-implantitis.
This treatment concept paper introduces a risk assessment tool, the Implant Disease Risk Assessment, (IDRA) which estimates the risk for a patient to develop peri-implantitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The functional risk assessment diagram was constructed incorporating eight parameters, each with documented evidence for an association with peri-implantitis.
RESULTS
The eight vectors of the diagram include (1) assessment of a history of periodontitis (2) percentage of sites with bleeding on probing (BOP) (3) number of teeth/implants with probing depths (PD) ≥5 mm (4) the ratio of periodontal bone loss (evaluated from a radiograph) divided by the patient's age (5) periodontitis susceptibility as described by the staging and grading categories from the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases (Journal of Periodontology, 89 Suppl 1, S159-S172, 2018) (6) the frequency/compliance with supportive periodontal therapy (7) the distance in mm from the restorative margin of the implant-supported prosthesis to the marginal bone crest and (8) prosthesis-related factors including cleanability and fit of the implant-supported prosthesis.
CONCLUSION
The combination of these factors in a risk assessment tool, IDRA, may be useful in identifying individuals at risk for development of peri-implantitis.
Date of Publication
2020-04
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
disease progression disease susceptibility patient compliance peri-implant disease "peri-implant mucositis" peri-implantitis periodontal diseases periodontal pocket risk assessment risk factors risk indicators
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa J A | |
Heitz, Fritz |
Additional Credits
Series
Clinical oral implants research
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN
0905-7161
Access(Rights)
open.access