• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Comparing treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures with intramedullary screws versus plating.
 

Comparing treatment of proximal phalangeal fractures with intramedullary screws versus plating.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48350/172259
Publisher DOI
10.1007/s00402-022-04516-z
PubMed ID
35994095
Description
PURPOSE

Phalangeal fractures are the most common injuries in humans and account for approximately 10% of all fractures. With plate fixation, anatomic reduction is achievable in most cases, but extension lag is seen in up to 67%. Intramedullary headless screw offers treatment of unstable proximal phalangeal fractures using a minimally invasive procedure with very few complications. One of the major disadvantages of this technique is the transarticular screw position, damaging the articular surface and thus preventing very proximal fractures from being treated with a distally inserted screw. In this study, we present a modified approach to the fixation of the proximal phalangeal fractures and compare outcomes with plate osteosynthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with 31 comparable fractures of the proximal phalanx were treated either with a plate (14) or with minimal invasive cannulated compression screw (17). Pain, strength, range of motion (ROM), work disability and QuickDASH score were assessed.

RESULTS

TAM was significantly better in the screw group. The extension lag was worse in the plate group. Plate removal had to be performed in 13 of 14 the cases, while the screw had to be removed in only 3 cases. The average duration of work disability was 9.9 weeks in the plate group, compared to 5.6 weeks in the screw group.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive screw osteosynthesis not only has the advantage of significantly shorter work disabilities, but also shows remarkably improved postoperative range of motion. In contrast to plate osteosynthesis, removal of the screw is only necessary in exceptional cases. With the antegrade screws position, even difficult fractures close to the base can be treated without destroying any articular surface. In proximal phalanx fractures with both options of plate or single-screw osteosynthesis, we recommend minimal invasive cannulated screw osteosynthesis.
Date of Publication
2023-03
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Intramedullary screw osteosynthesis Phalangeal fracture Plate Proximal phalanx
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Silins, Kaspars
Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie
Turkmen, Tutku
Vögelin, Esther
Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie
Haug, Luzian Carlo Peter
Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie, Handchirurgie und Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven
Additional Credits
Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie
Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie, Handchirurgie und Chirurgie der peripheren Nerven
Series
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
1434-3916
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo