• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. A treatment strategy to help select patients who may not need secondary intervention to remove symptomatic ureteral stones after previous stenting.
 

A treatment strategy to help select patients who may not need secondary intervention to remove symptomatic ureteral stones after previous stenting.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.141108
Publisher DOI
10.1007/s00345-020-03087-1
PubMed ID
31960109
Description
PURPOSE

This study aimed at evaluating whether removal of the ureteral stent the day before scheduled secondary intervention facilitates spontaneous ureteral stone passage and thus can spare the pre-stented patient this surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a single-centre consecutive series of 216 patients after previous stenting due to a symptomatic ureteral stone from 01/2013 to 01/2018. Indwelling stents were removed under local anaesthesia. Patients were told to filter their urine overnight. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage.

RESULTS

34% (74/216) of patients had spontaneous stone passage while the stent was indwelling. Of the remaining 142 patients, 41% (58/142) had spontaneous stone passage within 24 h after stent removal. Only 84/216 (39%) patients needed secondary intervention. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of all 216 patients showed a significant association between spontaneous stone passage and smaller stone size (p < 0.001), distal stone location (p = 0.046) and stent dwell time (p = 0.02). Predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage after stent removal were smaller size (p < 0.001), distal location (p = 0.001), and stone movement while the stent was indwelling (p = 0.016). A treatment strategy was established that helps select patients suitable for conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority (61%) of ureteral stones passed spontaneously after pre-stenting; 34% while the stent was indwelling, 27% within 24 h after stent removal. Besides distal stone location, stone size (< 6 mm) and stone movement (≥ 5 cm) while the stent is indwelling indicate patients who are likely to pass their ureteral stone spontaneously after stent removal. The treatment strategy (decision tree) presented here helps identify those patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12112914.
Date of Publication
2020-11
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Double J Pre-stenting Spontaneous stone passage Ureteral stone Urolithiasis
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Stojkova Gafner, Elena
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Grüter, Thomas
Furrer, Marc
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Bosshard, Piet
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Kiss, Bernhard
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Vartolomei, Mihai D
Roth, Beat
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Additional Credits
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Series
World journal of urology
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
ISSN
0724-4983
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo