Publication:
Get real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid05529e60-5bd2-4234-bf3b-e6bfb3d0e21e
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorDebray, Thomas P A
dc.contributor.authorMoons, Karel G M
dc.contributor.authorvan Valkenhoef, Gert
dc.contributor.authorEfthimiou, Orestis
dc.contributor.authorHummel, Noemi
dc.contributor.authorGroenwold, Rolf H H
dc.contributor.authorReitsma, Johannes B
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T19:22:26Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T19:22:26Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-19
dc.description.abstractIndividual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is an increasingly used approach for synthesizing and investigating treatment effect estimates. Over the past few years, numerous methods for conducting an IPD meta-analysis (IPD-MA) have been proposed, often making different assumptions and modeling choices while addressing a similar research question. We conducted a literature review to provide an overview of methods for performing an IPD-MA using evidence from clinical trials or non-randomized studies when investigating treatment efficacy. With this review, we aim to assist researchers in choosing the appropriate methods and provide recommendations on their implementation when planning and conducting an IPD-MA. © 2015 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.description.numberOfPages17
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.74622
dc.identifier.pmid26287812
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1002/jrsm.1160
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/137076
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofResearch Synthesis Methods
dc.relation.issn1759-2879
dc.relation.organizationInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectIPD
dc.subjectNRSI
dc.subjectRCT
dc.subjectcross-design
dc.subjectevidence synthesis
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjectnon-randomized intervention
dc.subjectstudies review
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleGet real in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage309
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage293
oaire.citation.volume6
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-10 07:33:26
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId74622
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleRES SYNTH METHODS
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Debray ResSynthMethods 2015.pdf
Size:
344.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Content:
published
Name:
Debray ResSynthMethods 2015_supplmat.pdf
Size:
183.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Content:
supplemental

Collections