Publication:
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Implant Placement With Simultaneous Horizontal Bone Augmentation.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-3206-5266
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-9989-4483
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid85610b79-e336-47be-abc2-9146e9bed23d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidf907b5fd-8946-4cff-b57c-001944477e2f
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd19ddfc9-dae4-4d9e-9c4e-af7768aa59b5
cris.virtualsource.author-orcida17e16cd-df8a-40ce-99a3-a8e5868d421e
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid8a6c7d3e-1ca1-419e-9f3a-683cbeb7191a
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid25977e14-9cf5-4fc1-a841-ee0db25fdfe9
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Dorian
dc.contributor.authorChappuis, Vivianne
dc.contributor.authorRaabe, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorSuter, Valerie G. A.
dc.contributor.authorFonseca, Manrique
dc.contributor.authorCouso-Queiruga, Emilio
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-12T11:30:12Z
dc.date.available2025-03-12T11:30:12Z
dc.date.issued2025-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation on patients' willingness to repeat the procedure. Secondary outcomes included assessing patient-reported outcome measures, clinical- and surgical-related factors affecting treatment outcomes. Methods Subjects who were currently undergoing or have undergone implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation in the esthetic region (maxillary second premolar to second premolar) were assigned to three groups: Group A (short-term), Group B (1-5 years post-surgery), and Group C (> 5 years post-surgery). Clinical assessments, dichotomous questions, and visual analogue scales were used to evaluate therapeutic outcomes according to the group of interest. Results One hundred and fifty patients completed the study (n = 50 per group). In Group A, 16% experienced wound dehiscence (membrane exposure < 3 mm), and 2% had postoperative bleeding, infection, swelling, or abscess. Flaps extending beyond three teeth significantly increased early membrane exposure (p = 0.04). Patient-reported postoperative discomfort (p < 0.001) and wound healing scores (p < 0.04) decreased over time. Willingness to repeat the procedure was 100%, 88%, and 98% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, with satisfaction rates of 98.2 ± 7.5, 91.2 ± 10.6, and 95.2 ± 10.9. No significant differences were found between Groups B and C for functional or esthetic satisfaction. However, Group C reported higher satisfaction and comfort (p < 0.001). Younger adults and women reported greater postoperative discomfort than older adults and men. Conclusions Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal bone augmentation in esthetic areas shows a high willingness of patients to repeat the procedure in the short-, mid-, and long-term. Additionally, this therapeutic approach yields low rates of postoperative complications and discomfort, along with high patient satisfaction related to functional performance, esthetics, and overall comfort.
dc.description.numberOfPages10
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Dental Medicine
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/85892
dc.identifier.pmid39898760
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1111/cid.70005
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/204713
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.relation.issn1708-8208
dc.relation.issn1523-0899
dc.subjectalveolar ridge augmentation
dc.subjectbone resorption
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectpatient‐reported outcomes
dc.subjecttooth extraction
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titlePatient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Implant Placement With Simultaneous Horizontal Bone Augmentation.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPagee70005
oaire.citation.volume27
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology
oairecerif.author.affiliationSchool of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
oairecerif.author.affiliation2School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Clin Implant Dent Rel Res - 2025 - Braun - Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures Following Implant Placement With Simultaneous.pdf
Size:
681.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
Publisher/Copright statement:
Publisher holds Copyright
Content:
published

Collections