Publication:
ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-7896-6188
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid37adcc41-bab0-4cfb-bc5f-05fb501fab99
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorBaughman, Robert P
dc.contributor.authorValeyre, Dominique
dc.contributor.authorKorsten, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMathioudakis, Alexander G
dc.contributor.authorWuyts, Wim A
dc.contributor.authorWells, Athol
dc.contributor.authorRottoli, Paola
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Hiliaro
dc.contributor.authorLower, Elyse E
dc.contributor.authorJudson, Marc A
dc.contributor.authorIsrael-Biet, Dominique
dc.contributor.authorGrutters, Jan C
dc.contributor.authorDrent, Marjolein
dc.contributor.authorCulver, Daniel A
dc.contributor.authorBonella, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Katerina
dc.contributor.authorMartone, Filippo
dc.contributor.authorQuadder, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorSpitzer, Ginger
dc.contributor.authorNagavci, Blin
dc.contributor.authorTonia, Thomai
dc.contributor.authorRigau, David
dc.contributor.authorOuellette, Daniel R
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T17:35:29Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T17:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations. MATERIALS AND METHODS A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. CONCLUSIONS There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment. MESSAGE An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.
dc.description.numberOfPages31
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/157076
dc.identifier.pmid34140301
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1183/13993003.04079-2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/42439
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Society
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean respiratory journal
dc.relation.issn0903-1936
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage2004079
oaire.citation.volume58
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2022-06-18 22:25:04
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-01-05 12:30:03
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId157076
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleEUR RESPIR J
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Baughman_EurRespirJ_2021_AAM.pdf
Size:
6.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
publisher
Content:
accepted
Name:
Baughman_EurRespirJ_2021.pdf
Size:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections