Prognostic value of the Geneva prediction rule in patients with pulmonary embolism
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
23714176
Description
BACKGROUND
Assessment of pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and prognostic stratification are two widely recommended steps in the management of patients with suspected PE. Some items of the Geneva prediction rule may have a prognostic value. We analyzed whether the initial probability assessed by the Geneva rule was associated with the outcome of patients with PE.
METHODS
In a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter trial including 1,693 patients with suspected PE, the all-cause death or readmission rates during the 3-month follow-up of patients with confirmed PE were analyzed. PE probability group was prospectively assessed by the revised Geneva score (RGS). Similar analyses were made with the a posteriori-calculated simplified Geneva score (SGS).
RESULTS
PE was confirmed in 357 patients and 21 (5.9%) died during the 3-month follow-up. The mortality rate differed significantly with the initial RGS group, as with the SGS group. For the RGS, the mortality increased from 0% (95% Confidence Interval: [0-5.4%]) in the low-probability group to 14.3% (95% CI: [6.3-28.2%]) in the high-probability group, and for the SGS, from 0% (95% CI: [0-5.4%] to 17.9% (95% CI: [7.4-36%]). Readmission occurred in 58 out of the 352 patients with complete information on readmission (16.5%). No significant change of readmission rate was found among the RGS or SGS groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Returning to the initial PE probability evaluation may help clinicians predict 3-month mortality in patients with confirmed PE. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00117169).
Assessment of pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) and prognostic stratification are two widely recommended steps in the management of patients with suspected PE. Some items of the Geneva prediction rule may have a prognostic value. We analyzed whether the initial probability assessed by the Geneva rule was associated with the outcome of patients with PE.
METHODS
In a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter trial including 1,693 patients with suspected PE, the all-cause death or readmission rates during the 3-month follow-up of patients with confirmed PE were analyzed. PE probability group was prospectively assessed by the revised Geneva score (RGS). Similar analyses were made with the a posteriori-calculated simplified Geneva score (SGS).
RESULTS
PE was confirmed in 357 patients and 21 (5.9%) died during the 3-month follow-up. The mortality rate differed significantly with the initial RGS group, as with the SGS group. For the RGS, the mortality increased from 0% (95% Confidence Interval: [0-5.4%]) in the low-probability group to 14.3% (95% CI: [6.3-28.2%]) in the high-probability group, and for the SGS, from 0% (95% CI: [0-5.4%] to 17.9% (95% CI: [7.4-36%]). Readmission occurred in 58 out of the 352 patients with complete information on readmission (16.5%). No significant change of readmission rate was found among the RGS or SGS groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Returning to the initial PE probability evaluation may help clinicians predict 3-month mortality in patients with confirmed PE. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00117169).
Date of Publication
2013-07
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
CI
•
CT
•
MDCTA
•
OR
•
Odds Ratio
•
PE
•
PESI
•
Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index
•
Pulmonary embolism
•
RGS
•
Revised Geneva Score
•
SGS
•
Simplified Geneva Score
•
V/Q
•
clinical prediction rule
•
computed tomography
•
confidence intervals
•
death
•
multidetector computed tomography angiography
•
prognosis
•
pulmonary embolism
•
readmission
•
ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy rule computed tomography confidence intervals death multidetector computed tomography angiography prognosis pulmonary embolism readmission ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Bertoletti, Laurent | |
Le Gal, Grégoire | |
Sanchez, Olivier | |
Roy, Pierre-Marie | |
Verschuren, Franck | |
Bounameaux, Henri | |
Perrier, Arnaud | |
Righini, Marc |
Additional Credits
Series
Thrombosis research
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0049-3848
Access(Rights)
restricted