Publication:
Robust optimization strategies for contour uncertainties in online adaptive radiation therapy.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4556e057-c3b2-4a7d-ab61-3bb9c7dbc233
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorSmolders, A
dc.contributor.authorBengtsson, I
dc.contributor.authorForsgren, A
dc.contributor.authorLomax, A
dc.contributor.authorWeber, D C
dc.contributor.authorFredriksson, A
dc.contributor.authorAlbertini, F
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-25T11:05:57Z
dc.date.available2025-02-25T11:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-30
dc.description.abstractObjective.Online adaptive radiation therapy requires fast and automated contouring of daily scans for treatment plan re-optimization. However, automated contouring is imperfect and introduces contour uncertainties. This work aims at developing and comparing robust optimization strategies accounting for such uncertainties.Approach.A deep-learning method was used to predict the uncertainty of deformable image registration, and to generate a finite set of daily contour samples. Ten optimization strategies were compared: two baseline methods, five methods that convert contour samples into voxel-wise probabilities, and three methods accounting explicitly for contour samples as scenarios in robust optimization. Target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing were evaluated robustly for simplified proton therapy plans for five head-and-neck cancer patients.Results.We found that explicitly including target contour uncertainty in robust optimization provides robust target coverage with better OAR sparing than the baseline methods, without increasing the optimization time. Although OAR doses first increased when increasing target robustness, this effect could be prevented by additionally including robustness to OAR contour uncertainty. Compared to the probability-based methods, the scenario-based methods spared the OARs more, but increased integral dose and required more computation time.Significance.This work proposed efficient and beneficial strategies to mitigate contour uncertainty in treatment plan optimization. This facilitates the adoption of automatic contouring in online adaptive radiation therapy and, more generally, enables mitigation also of other sources of contour uncertainty in treatment planning.
dc.description.sponsorshipClinic of Radiation Oncology
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/85496
dc.identifier.pmid39025113
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1088/1361-6560/ad6526
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/205409
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIOP Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofPhysics in Medicine & Biology
dc.relation.issn1361-6560
dc.relation.issn0031-9155
dc.subjectadaptive radiotherapy
dc.subjectautomatic contouring
dc.subjectcontour propagation
dc.subjectcontour uncertainty
dc.subjectdeformable image registration
dc.subjectrobust optimization
dc.titleRobust optimization strategies for contour uncertainties in online adaptive radiation therapy.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue16
oaire.citation.volume69
oairecerif.author.affiliationClinic of Radiation Oncology
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.contributor.rolecorresponding author
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Smolders_2024_Phys._Med._Biol._69_165001.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections