Sensitivity of ICD coding for sepsis in children-a population-based study.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
37342815
Description
BACKGROUND
International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease.
AIM
To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
METHODS
Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals.
RESULTS
We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (p < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data.
CONCLUSIONS
In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1.
International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) is widely used to describe the burden of disease.
AIM
To describe how well ICD-10 coding captures sepsis in children admitted to the hospital with blood culture-proven bacterial or fungal infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
METHODS
Secondary analysis of a population-based, multicenter, prospective cohort study on children with blood culture-proven sepsis of nine tertiary pediatric hospitals in Switzerland. We compared the agreement of validated study data on sepsis criteria with ICD-10 coding abstraction obtained at the participating hospitals.
RESULTS
We analyzed 998 hospital admissions of children with blood culture-proven sepsis. The sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 60% (95%-CI 57-63) for sepsis; 35% (95%-CI 31-39) for sepsis with organ dysfunction, using an explicit abstraction strategy; and 65% (95%-CI 61-69) using an implicit abstraction strategy. For septic shock, the sensitivity of ICD-10 coding abstraction was 43% (95%-CI 37-50). Agreement of ICD-10 coding abstraction with validated study data varied by the underlying infection type and disease severity (p < 0.05). The estimated national incidence of sepsis, inferred from ICD-10 coding abstraction, was 12.5 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 11.7-13.5) and 21.0 per 100,000 children (95%-CI 19.8-22.2) using validated study data.
CONCLUSIONS
In this population-based study, we found a poor representation of sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction by ICD-10 coding abstraction in children with blood culture-proven sepsis when compared against a prospective validated research dataset. Sepsis estimates in children based on ICD-10 coding may thus severely underestimate the true prevalence of the disease.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44253-023-00006-1.
Date of Publication
2023
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
Bacteremia Clinical coding Critical care International Classification of Diseases Population surveillance Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Triep, Karen | |
Schlapbach, Luregn J | |
Posfay-Barbe, Klara M | |
Heininger, Ulrich | |
Giannoni, Eric | |
Stocker, Martin | |
Niederer-Loher, Anita | |
Kahlert, Christian R | |
Natalucci, Giancarlo | |
Relly, Christa | |
Berger, Christoph |
Additional Credits
Series
Intensive care medicine. Paediatric and neonatal
Publisher
Springer
ISSN
2731-944X
Access(Rights)
open.access