• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland.
 

Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey of women in Switzerland.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/163877
Date of Publication
May 10, 2021
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Oelhafen, Stephan
Trachsel, Manuel
Monteverde, Settimio
Raio, Luigi
Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde
Cignacco, Eva
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1471-2393
Publisher
BioMed Central
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1186/s12884-021-03826-1
PubMed ID
33971841
Uncontrolled Keywords

Abuse Childbirth Coer...

Description
BACKGROUND

In many countries, the increase in facility births is accompanied by a high rate of obstetric interventions. Lower birthrates or elevated risk factors such as women's higher age at childbirth and an increased need for control and security cannot entirely explain this rise in obstetric interventions. Another possible factor is that women are coerced to agree to interventions, but the prevalence of coercive interventions in Switzerland is unknown.

METHODS

In a nationwide cross-sectional online survey, we assessed the prevalence of informal coercion during childbirth, women's satisfaction with childbirth, and the prevalence of women at risk of postpartum depression. Women aged 18 years or older who had given birth in Switzerland within the previous 12 months were recruited online through Facebook ads or through various offline channels. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the risk ratios associated with multiple individual and contextual factors.

RESULTS

In total, 6054 women completed the questionnaire (a dropout rate of 16.2%). An estimated 26.7% of women experienced some form of informal coercion during childbirth. As compared to vaginal delivery, cesarean section (CS) and instrumental vaginal birth were associated with an increased risk of informal coercion (planned CS risk ratio [RR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [1.18,1.96]; unplanned CS RR: 1.92 [1.61,2.28]; emergency CS RR: 2.10 [1.71,2.58]; instrumental vaginal birth RR: 2.17 [1.85,2.55]). Additionally, migrant women (RR: 1.45 [1.26,1.66]) and women for whom a self-determined vaginal birth was more important (RR: 1.15 [1.06,1.24]) more often reported informal coercion. Emergency cesarean section (RR: 1.32 [1.08,1.62]), being transferred to hospital (RR: 1.33 [1.11,1.60]), and experiencing informal coercion (RR: 1.35 [1.19,1.54]) were all associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression. Finally, women who had a non-instrumental vaginal birth reported higher satisfaction with childbirth while women who experienced informal coercion reported lower satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

One in four women experience informal coercion during childbirth, and this experience is associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression and lower satisfaction with childbirth. To prevent traumatic after-effects, health care professionals should make every effort to prevent informal coercion and to ensure sensitive aftercare for all new mothers.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/59578
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
33971841_s12884-021-03826-1.pdftextAdobe PDF664.62 KBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 960e9e [21.08. 13:49]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo