• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior stabilization in fragility fractures of the pelvis: Reoperations, perioperative burden, and radiographic outcomes.

Posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior stabilization in fragility fractures of the pelvis: Reoperations, perioperative burden, and radiographic outcomes.

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/99719
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.injury.2026.113523
PubMed ID
42475930
Abstract
Background
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are increasingly encountered in older adults, but the value of additional anterior ring fixation in surgically treated fractures involving both the anterior and posterior pelvic ring remains uncertain. We compared posterior-only with combined anterior-posterior stabilization in FFP.Methods
In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we included patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent operative stabilization of FFP between 2013 and 2024. Eligible patients had osteoporosis- or low-energy-related fractures with preoperative computed tomography confirmation of combined anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement. Patients underwent combined anterior-posterior stabilization (group 1, n = 31) or posterior-only stabilization (group 2, n = 24). The primary outcome was reoperation within 2 years. Secondary outcomes were blood loss, operative time, and length of stay. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed longitudinally with linear mixed-effects models.Results
Posterior-only fixation was not associated with a higher reoperation rate; reoperation occurred in 1/24 patients (4%) in group 2 and 5/31 (16%) in group 1 (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-2.02; p = 0.216). Posterior-only stabilization was associated with substantially lower blood loss (median, 20 vs 200 mL; p < 0.0001) and shorter operative time (46 vs 160 min; p < 0.0001), with a nonsignificant trend toward shorter hospital stay (6.5 vs 10 days; p = 0.0615). Across radiographic follow-up, no consistent postoperative differences were observed in fracture gap, pelvic symmetry, or vertical alignment. Exploratory subgroup analysis restricted to FFP types 3 and 4 yielded similar findings.Conclusions
Among older adults undergoing surgery for FFP involving both pelvic rings, posterior-only stabilization was associated with lower perioperative burden and similar radiographic evolution, without evidence of increased reoperation. These findings do not support routine addition of anterior fixation.
Date Issued
2026-07-19
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Subjects
FFP
•
Fracture
•
Geriatric
•
Pelvic ring
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Gewiess, Jan  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Karampitianis, Spyridon  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Bastian, Johannes Dominik  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Lustenberger, Thomas  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Deml, Moritz Caspar  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Tinner, Christian  
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Additional Credits
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery  
Journal
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1879-0267
0020-1383
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify