Publication:
Making room for affordable housing: Project-based negotiations between planning authorities and landowners in Dutch and Swiss densification

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3620-8642
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-3927-2903
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-9111-9071
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidce1375d2-e8b6-433c-a61d-3d89981fecf9
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid288078e6-cd5c-4be3-8c6e-7b4200761e57
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidfbfc1406-eb08-44a5-a2fb-67e26e463779
dc.contributor.authorBouwmeester, Josje Anna
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorAy, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorGerber, Jean-David
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-31T22:17:34Z
dc.date.available2025-03-31T22:17:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.description.abstractThe emerging objective to combat urban sprawl has put densification on the political agenda. Simultaneously, the complexity of planning within the existing built environment means that planning increasingly occurs on the project level. Project-based negotiations between planning authorities and landowners, in which agreements between parties are formalized in negotiated land use plans or private law contracts, thus shape the outcomes of densification projects. Considering the potential adverse effects of densification on housing affordability, it is important to understand how this shift towards project-based negotiations affects the ability of planners to secure public benefits such as affordable housing in redevelopment projects. This study uses a neo-institutional framework to analyze the negotiations between landowners and planning authorities and illuminates under which conditions affordable housing is provided. Case studies of six projects in two larger-scale redevelopment areas in the cities of Bern (Switzerland) and Nieuwegein (Netherlands) show this ability is highly dependent on (1) the existence of binding affordable housing targets, (2) landownership by non-profit actors, and (3) the direct involvement of citizens. The cases show a distinction between different types of project negotiations. In the Netherlands, contract-based negotiations can lead to the dilution of affordability targets, while in Switzerland, these targets are implemented more consistently through negotiated land use plans. The findings indicate that a project-based approach to planning may speed up the implementation of densification objectives but comes at the cost of democratic accountability. Instead, to ensure the social sustainability of urban densification projects, the scope of negotiations between planners and developers needs to move beyond cost-benefit considerations to include a broader range of public interests.
dc.description.sponsorshipGeographisches Institut (GIUB) - Politische Stadtforschung und nachhaltige Raumentwicklung
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/198971
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107264
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/208981
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science
dc.relation.ispartofLand use policy
dc.relation.issn0264-8377
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C062E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C199E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C77BE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc900 - History::910 - Geography & travel
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::320 - Political science
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::340 - Law
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::350 - Public administration & military science
dc.titleMaking room for affordable housing: Project-based negotiations between planning authorities and landowners in Dutch and Swiss densification
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.startPage107264
oaire.citation.volume144
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeographisches Institut (GIUB) - Politische Stadtforschung und nachhaltige Raumentwicklung
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeographisches Institut (GIUB) - Politische Stadtforschung und nachhaltige Raumentwicklung
oairecerif.author.affiliationGeographisches Institut (GIUB) - Politische Stadtforschung und nachhaltige Raumentwicklung
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Geographisches Institut (GIUB)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2024-07-12 13:03:37
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId198971
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleLAND USE POLICY
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0264837724002175-main.pdf
Size:
3.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections