• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Small plots, big stakes: Strategic responses to individual landowners’ property rights in densification projects

Small plots, big stakes: Strategic responses to individual landowners’ property rights in densification projects

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/92618
Publisher DOI
10.1177/00420980251379767
Abstract
One of the difficulties in implementing densification objectives is that planners often do not have sufficient coercive power to restrict property rights, which means that landowners can resist the implementation of land use plans. As a result, planning increasingly takes place on the project level, allowing planning authorities and developers to renegotiate the terms and conditions of densification. While project-level negotiations have been researched, these studies do not focus on individual landowners but rather on developers. This article examines how developers and public authorities manage the property rights of individual landowners to prevent delays or blockages in project implementation. Drawing on a comparative case study of Thun (Switzerland) and Utrecht (Netherlands), we show how project-based planning takes different forms depending on legal frameworks and planning norms. In Thun, strategies focus on consensus building and input legitimacy; in Utrecht, more coercive instruments such as expropriation are used and legitimized based on their output. The findings suggest that project-based planning tends to exclude individual landowners from negotiation, framing their objections as obstructions to be managed. While individual owners’ interests are often sidelined, the private economic interests of developers and large landowners often appeal to collective goals such as climate change mitigation or housing supply. This raises broader questions about which interests are recognized, or dismissed, in the construction of social sustainability in urban densification.
Date Issued
2025-11-11
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
900 History > 910 Geography & travel
Subjects
densification planning negotiations
•
project-based planning
•
property rights
•
social sustainability
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Bouwmeester, Josje
Ay, Deniz  
Institute of Geography, Human Geography  
Institute of Geography, Political Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development  
Institute of Geography  
Gerber, Jean-David  
Institute of Geography, Political Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development  
Institute of Geography  
Hartmann, Thomas
Additional Credits
Institute of Geography, Political Urbanism and Sustainable Spatial Development  
Institute of Geography  
Institute of Geography, Human Geography  
CRED - Geographie  
Center for Regional Economic Development (CRED)  
Journal
Urban Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
ISSN
0042-0980
1360-063X
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify