• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return
 

Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.85971
Date of Publication
July 15, 2016
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Berger, David
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Werner Möller, Per
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Weber, Alberto
Bloch, Andreas
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Bloechlinger, Stefan
Hänggi, Matthiasorcid-logo
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Sondergaard, Soren
Jakob, Stephan
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Magder, Sheldon
Takala, Jukka
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
American journal of physiology - heart and circulatory physiology
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0363-6135
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1152/ajpheart.00931.2015
PubMed ID
27422991
Uncontrolled Keywords

blood volume

cardiac output

mean systemic filling...

mechanical ventilatio...

right atrial pressure...

Description
According to Guyton's model of circulation, mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), right atrial pressure (RAP), and resistance to venous return (RVR) determine venous return. MSFP has been estimated from inspiratory hold-induced changes in RAP and blood flow. We studied the impact of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and blood volume on venous return and MSFP in pigs. MSFPRAO was measured by balloon occlusion of right atrium and MSFPinsp_hold extrapolated from RAP/pulmonary artery flow (QPA) relationships during inspiratory holds at PEEP 5 and 10 cmH2O, after bleeding and in hypervolemia. MSFPRAO increased with PEEP [PEEP 5, mean (SD) 12.9 (2.5) mmHg; PEEP 10 14.0 (2.6) mmHg, p=.002] without change in QPA [2.75 (.43) vs. 2.56 (.45) L/min, p=.094]. MSFPRAO decreased after bleeding and increased in hypervolemia [10.8 (2.2) and 16.4 (3.0) mmHg respectively p<.001], with parallel changes in QPA. Neither PEEP nor volume state altered RVR (p=.489). MSFPinsp_hold overestimated MSFPRAO [16.5 (5.8) mmHg vs.13.6 (3.2) mmHg; p=.001; mean difference 3.0 (5.1) mmHg]. Inspiratory holds shifted the RAP/QPA relationship rightwards in euvolemia because inferior vena cava flow (QIVC) recovered early after an inspiratory hold nadir. The QIVC nadir was lowest after bleeding [36 % (24 %) of pre-inspiratory hold at 15 cmH2O inspiratory pressure] and the QIVC recovery most complete at lowest inspiratory pressures independent of volume state [range from 80 (7) % after bleeding to 103 (8) % at PEEP 10 cmH2O of QIVC before inspiratory hold]. The QIVC recovery thus defends venous return, possibly via hepatosplanchnic vascular waterfall.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/143776
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
2016 08 16 - Berger_PubMed 27422991_Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and 1 inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return.pdftextAdobe PDF10.81 MBpublisheracceptedOpen
2016 09 15 - Berger_PubMed 27422991_Effect of PEEP, blood volume, and 1 inspiratory hold maneuvers on venous return.pdftextAdobe PDF2.31 MBpublisherpublished restricted
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo