Good Fun: Cecily Chaumpaigne and the Ethics of Chaucerian Obscenity
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
2021
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Series
The Chaucer review : a journal of medieval studies and literary criticism
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1528-4204
Publisher
Pennsylvania State University Press
Language
English
Publisher DOI
Description
This essay examines the interplay between enjoyment of Chaucer’s obscene
humor (particularly in the Canterbury Tales) and scholarly interpretations of the most troubling episode from Chaucer’s life: Cecily Chaumpaigne’s accusations of raptus. It argues that, because scholars and readers are determined to protect their ability to enjoy Chaucer’s work freely, they often allow their views of Chaucer as a bawdy humorist to infiltrate their discussions of the Chaumpaigne case. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s figure of the “feminist killjoy,” this essay concludes with the suggestion that we approach Chaucer’s work and biography with the willingness to think critically about our enjoyment of his work, and how it might affect our judgment of the poet himself.
humor (particularly in the Canterbury Tales) and scholarly interpretations of the most troubling episode from Chaucer’s life: Cecily Chaumpaigne’s accusations of raptus. It argues that, because scholars and readers are determined to protect their ability to enjoy Chaucer’s work freely, they often allow their views of Chaucer as a bawdy humorist to infiltrate their discussions of the Chaumpaigne case. Drawing on Sara Ahmed’s figure of the “feminist killjoy,” this essay concludes with the suggestion that we approach Chaucer’s work and biography with the willingness to think critically about our enjoyment of his work, and how it might affect our judgment of the poet himself.
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
chaucerrev.56.4.0360.pdf | Adobe PDF | 2.03 MB | publisher | published |