Publication:
Do different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4715-8465
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-2445-984X
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid57ca2768-8af2-4849-b42c-9fadbbe47133
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid9ae3af70-6f62-4024-b205-59839f11dcf8
dc.contributor.authorSchauber, Stefan K.
dc.contributor.authorHautz, Stefanie Carola
dc.contributor.authorKämmer, Juliane E.
dc.contributor.authorStroben, Fabian
dc.contributor.authorHautz, Wolf
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T17:37:50Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T17:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.description.abstractThe use of response formats in assessments of medical knowledge and clinical reasoning continues to be the focus of both research and debate. In this article, we report on an experimental study in which we address the question of how much list-type selected response formats and short-essay type constructed response formats are related to differences in how test takers approach clinical reasoning tasks. The design of this study was informed by a framework developed within cognitive psychology which stresses the importance of the interplay between two components of reasoning-self-monitoring and response inhibition-while solving a task or case. The results presented support the argument that different response formats are related to different processing behavior. Importantly, the pattern of how different factors are related to a correct response in both situations seem to be well in line with contemporary accounts of reasoning. Consequently, we argue that when designing assessments of clinical reasoning, it is crucial to tap into the different facets of this complex and important medical process.
dc.description.numberOfPages16
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitäres Notfallzentrum
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/157409
dc.identifier.pmid33977409
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1007/s10459-021-10052-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/42612
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAdvances in health sciences education
dc.relation.issn1382-4996
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BA4CE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleDo different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1354
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage1339
oaire.citation.volume26
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitäres Notfallzentrum
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitäres Notfallzentrum
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2021-07-12 09:52:40
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId157409
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleADV HEALTH SCI EDUC
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Schauber2021_Article_DoDifferentResponseFormatsAffe.pdf
Size:
766.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections