• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Contrasting effects of grassland management modes on species-abundance distributions of multiple groups
 

Contrasting effects of grassland management modes on species-abundance distributions of multiple groups

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.96134
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.022
Description
Intensive land use is a major cause of biodiversity loss, but most studies comparing the response of multiple taxa rely on simple diversity measures while analyses of other community attributes are only recently gaining attention. Species-abundance distributions (SADs) are a community attribute that can be used to study changes in the overall abundance structure of species groups, and whether these changes are driven by abundant or rare species.

We evaluated the effect of grassland management intensity for three land-use modes (fertilization, mowing, grazing) and their combination on species richness and SADs for three belowground (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, prokaryotes and insect larvae) and seven aboveground groups (vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens; arthropod herbivores; arthropod pollinators; bats and birds). Three descriptors of SADs were evaluated: general shape (abundance decay rate), proportion of rare species (rarity) and proportional abundance of the commonest species (dominance).

Across groups, taxonomic richness was largely unaffected by land-use intensity and only decreased with increasing mowing intensity. Of the three SAD descriptors, abundance decay rate became steeper with increasing combined land-use intensity across groups. This reflected a decrease in rarity among plants, herbivores and vertebrates. Effects of fertilization on the three descriptors were similar to the combined land-use intensity effects. Mowing intensity only affected the SAD descriptors of insect larvae and vertebrates, while grazing intensity produced a range of effects on different descriptors in distinct groups. Overall, belowground groups had more even abundance distributions than aboveground groups. Strong differences among aboveground groups and between above- and belowground groups indicate that no single taxonomic group can serve as an indicator for effects in other groups.

In the past, the use of SADs has been hampered by concerns over theoretical models underlying specific forms of SADs. Our study shows that SAD descriptors that are not connected to a particular model are suitable to assess the effect of land use on community structure.
Date of Publication
2017-01-16
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
500 Science > 580 Plants (Botany)
Keyword(s)
Biodiversity
•
Cutting frequency
•
Management intensity
•
Rank-abundance
•
Species loss
•
Rarity
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Simons, Nadja K.
Lewinsohn, Thomas
Blüthgen, Nico
Buscot, François
Boch, Steffen
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Daniel, Rolf
Gossner, Martin M.
Jung, Kirsten
Kaiser, Kristin
Müller, Jörg
Prati, Daniel
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Renner, Swen C.
Socher, Stephanie
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Sonnemann, Ilja
Weiner, Christiane N.
Werner, Michael
Wubet, Tesfaye
Wurst, Susanne
Weisser, Wolfgang W.
Additional Credits
Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
Series
Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0167-8809
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo