• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Association of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-Injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of ENIO Prospective Observational Study
 

Association of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support with Extubation Outcomes in Brain-Injured Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Secondary Analysis of ENIO Prospective Observational Study

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48350/183537
Publisher DOI
10.1164/rccm.202212-2249OC
PubMed ID
37192445
Description
RATIONALE

Non-invasive respiratory support using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) can decrease the risk of reintubation in patients being liberated from mechanical ventilation, but effects in patients with acute brain injury are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support and reintubation in patients with acute brain injury being liberated from mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective, observational study of mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury (NCT03400904). The primary endpoint was reintubation during ICU admission. We used mixed effects logistic regression models with patient-level covariates and random intercepts for hospital and country to evaluate the association between prophylactic (i.e, planned) HFNC or NIPPV and reintubation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

1,115 patients were included from 62 hospitals and 19 countries, of whom 267 received HFNC or NIPPV following extubation (23.9%). Compared to conventional oxygen therapy, neither prophylactic HFNC nor NIPPV was associated with decreased risk of reintubation (respectively, odds ratio (OR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.54-1.73; OR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.30-1.32). Findings remained consistent in sensitivity analyses accounting for alternate adjustment procedures, missing data, shorter timeframes of extubation failure, and competing risks precluding reintubation. In a Bayesian analysis using skeptical and data-driven priors, the probability of reduced reintubation ranged from 17-34% for HFNC and 46-74% for NIPPV.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of brain-injured patients undergoing liberation from mechanical ventilation, prophylactic use of HFNC and NIPPV were not associated with reintubation. Prospective trials are needed to explore treatment effects in this population.
Date of Publication
2023-08-01
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
brain injury high flow nasal cannula intensive care medicine non-invasive positive pressure ventilation ventilator liberation
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Taran, Shaurya
Diaz-Cruz, Camilo
Perrot, Bastien
Alvarez, Pablo
Godoy, Daniel Agustin
Gurjar, Mohan
Hänggi, Matthiasorcid-logo
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Mijangos, Julio Cesar
Pelosi, Paolo
Robba, Chiara
Schultz, Marcus J
Ueno, Yoshitoyo
Asehnoune, Karim
Cho, Sung Min
Yarnell, Christopher J
Cinotti, Raphael
Stevens, Robert D
Additional Credits
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Series
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Publisher
American Thoracic Society
ISSN
1535-4970
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo