• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis.

An investigation of the impact of using contrast- and arm-synthesis models for network meta-analysis.

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/94372
Publisher DOI
10.1017/rsm.2025.18
PubMed ID
41626917
Abstract
Network meta-analysis allows the synthesis of relative effects from several treatments. Two broad approaches are available to synthesize the data: arm-synthesis and contrast-synthesis, with several models that can be fitted within each. Limited evaluations comparing these approaches are available. We re-analyzed 118 networks of interventions with binary outcomes using three contrast-synthesis models (CSM; one fitted in a frequentist framework and two in a Bayesian framework) and two arm-synthesis models (ASM; both fitted in a Bayesian framework). We compared the estimated log odds ratios, their standard errors, ranking measures and the between-trial heterogeneity using the different models and investigated if differences in the results were modified by network characteristics. In general, we observed good agreement with respect to the odds ratios, their standard errors and the ranking metrics between the two Bayesian CSMs. However, differences were observed when comparing the frequentist CSM and the ASMs to each other and to the Bayesian CSMs. The network characteristics that we investigated, which represented the connectedness of the networks and rareness of events, were associated with the differences observed between models, but no single factor was associated with the differences across all of the metrics. In conclusion, we found that different models used to synthesize evidence in a network meta-analysis (NMA) can yield different estimates of odds ratios and standard errors that can impact the final ranking of the treatment options compared.
Date Issued
2025-07
Publication Type
Article
Subjects
arm-based
•
contrast-based
•
empirical evaluation
•
indirect treatment comparison
•
mixed-treatment comparison
•
network meta-analysis
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Karahalios, Amalia
White, Ian R
Turner, Simon L
Salanti, Georgia  orcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM) - Evidence Synthesis Methods  
Herbison, G Peter
Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
McKenzie, Joanne E
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani
Additional Credits
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM) - Evidence Synthesis Methods  
Journal
Research Synthesis Methods
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
ISSN
1759-2887
1759-2879
Funding(s)
Health Research Council of New Zealand  
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)  
Medical Research Council UK  
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft  
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 24f0a9 [ 4.09. 8:55]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify