• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6)
 

Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6)

Options
  • Details
Publisher DOI
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60659-0
PubMed ID
19515413
Description
BACKGROUND:

Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist.
METHODS:

Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1.8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 microg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882.
FINDINGS:

Mean baseline HbA(1c) for the study population was 8.2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA(1c) significantly more than did exenatide (-1.12% [SE 0.08] vs -0.79% [0.08]; estimated treatment difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.18; p<0.0001) and more patients achieved a HbA(1c) value of less than 7% (54%vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2.02; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.11; p=0.0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1.61 mmol/L [SE 0.20] vs -0.60 mmol/L [0.20]; estimated treatment difference -1.01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.65; p<0.0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3.24 kg vs exenatide -2.87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0.448, p<0.0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1.93 vs 2.60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88; p=0.0131; 25.5%vs 33.6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode.
INTERPRETATION:

Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations.
Date of Publication
2009
Publication Type
Article
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Buse, JB
Rosenstock, J
Sesti, G
Schmidt, WE
Montanya, E
Brett, JH
Zychma, M
Blonde, L
Ahmed, A
Alvarsson, M
Anderson, C
Aoki, A
Aranko, S
Bailey, B
Barbonta, D
Baur, C
Bednarczyk-Kaluzny, M
Blevins, T
Blonde, L
Bode, B
Bressler, P
Brusco, O
Buse, JB
Byrd, L
Byrne, M
Caldarella, F
Cheatham, W
Christ, Emanuel
Universitätspoliklinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Klinische Ernährung
Christiansen, JS
Comas, LM
Cooper, J
Corder, C
Corser, B
Courreges, JP
Creteanu, G
Cuddihy, R
Derezinski, T
Downey, H
Duckor, S
Eidenmüller, M
Elliott, S
Farrell, J
Fusco, F
Gaczarek-Belczyk, E
Gallwitz, B
Garber, A
Gerber, P
Gibney, J
Glodowska, K
Gollapudi, G
Gouet, D
Greco, S
Grill, V
Gudnason, S
Guerci, B
Gumprecht, J
Henriksen, JE
Hermansen, K
Hippler, S
Hoekstra, J
Hoffman, B
Hollander, P
Jaeckel, E
Jain, R
Janez, A
Kaiser, M
Kaladas, J
Kapoor, A
Kayne, D
Keller, U
Kempe, HP
Klein, E
Klonoff, D
Koehler, L
Korytkowski, M
Laine, DH
Le Devehat, C
Lervang, HH
Levinson, L
Lewin, A
Lilavivat, U
Lipetz, R
Lubin, B
Luedemann, J
Madsbad, S
Mäkelä, J
Marck, C
Matejek, N
Menéndez, E
Montanya, E
Milenkovic, T
Mira, R
Moberg, E
Musat, D
Nolan, J
Ollins, R
Ortiz-Carrasquillo, R
Osei, K
Peterson, G
Philippe, J
Pietri, A
Piletic, M
Polaszewska-Muszynska, M
Pollock, J
Prager, R
Radparvar, A
Ratcliff, L
Reed, J
Reeves, M
Rock, K
Rosenstock, J
Sall, K
Schabowski, J
Schernthaner, G
Schmidt, WE
Schwartz, S
Segiet, T
Serfer, G
Sieradzki, J
Smith, D
Søfteland, E
Solano, FV
Stasinska, T
Staut, M
Stearns, P
Stoll, M
Strand, J
Tamayo, R
Toplak, H
Townsend, R
Vaag, A
Vance, C
Wascher, T
Weinstein, R
Weiss, D
Wendisch, U
Wenzl-Bauer, V
Whittier, F
Wizemann, E
Additional Credits
Universitätspoliklinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Klinische Ernährung
Series
Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0140-6736
Access(Rights)
metadata.only
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: dd892c [ 9.04. 8:30]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo