Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6)
Options
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
19515413
Description
BACKGROUND:
Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist.
METHODS:
Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1.8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 microg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882.
FINDINGS:
Mean baseline HbA(1c) for the study population was 8.2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA(1c) significantly more than did exenatide (-1.12% [SE 0.08] vs -0.79% [0.08]; estimated treatment difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.18; p<0.0001) and more patients achieved a HbA(1c) value of less than 7% (54%vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2.02; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.11; p=0.0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1.61 mmol/L [SE 0.20] vs -0.60 mmol/L [0.20]; estimated treatment difference -1.01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.65; p<0.0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3.24 kg vs exenatide -2.87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0.448, p<0.0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1.93 vs 2.60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88; p=0.0131; 25.5%vs 33.6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode.
INTERPRETATION:
Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations.
Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist.
METHODS:
Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1.8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 microg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882.
FINDINGS:
Mean baseline HbA(1c) for the study population was 8.2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA(1c) significantly more than did exenatide (-1.12% [SE 0.08] vs -0.79% [0.08]; estimated treatment difference -0.33; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.18; p<0.0001) and more patients achieved a HbA(1c) value of less than 7% (54%vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2.02; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.11; p=0.0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1.61 mmol/L [SE 0.20] vs -0.60 mmol/L [0.20]; estimated treatment difference -1.01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.37 to -0.65; p<0.0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3.24 kg vs exenatide -2.87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0.448, p<0.0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1.93 vs 2.60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88; p=0.0131; 25.5%vs 33.6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode.
INTERPRETATION:
Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations.
Date of Publication
2009
Publication Type
Article
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Buse, JB | |
Rosenstock, J | |
Sesti, G | |
Schmidt, WE | |
Montanya, E | |
Brett, JH | |
Zychma, M | |
Blonde, L | |
Ahmed, A | |
Alvarsson, M | |
Anderson, C | |
Aoki, A | |
Aranko, S | |
Bailey, B | |
Barbonta, D | |
Baur, C | |
Bednarczyk-Kaluzny, M | |
Blevins, T | |
Blonde, L | |
Bode, B | |
Bressler, P | |
Brusco, O | |
Buse, JB | |
Byrd, L | |
Byrne, M | |
Caldarella, F | |
Cheatham, W | |
Christiansen, JS | |
Comas, LM | |
Cooper, J | |
Corder, C | |
Corser, B | |
Courreges, JP | |
Creteanu, G | |
Cuddihy, R | |
Derezinski, T | |
Downey, H | |
Duckor, S | |
Eidenmüller, M | |
Elliott, S | |
Farrell, J | |
Fusco, F | |
Gaczarek-Belczyk, E | |
Gallwitz, B | |
Garber, A | |
Gerber, P | |
Gibney, J | |
Glodowska, K | |
Gollapudi, G | |
Gouet, D | |
Greco, S | |
Grill, V | |
Gudnason, S | |
Guerci, B | |
Gumprecht, J | |
Henriksen, JE | |
Hermansen, K | |
Hippler, S | |
Hoekstra, J | |
Hoffman, B | |
Hollander, P | |
Jaeckel, E | |
Jain, R | |
Janez, A | |
Kaiser, M | |
Kaladas, J | |
Kapoor, A | |
Kayne, D | |
Keller, U | |
Kempe, HP | |
Klein, E | |
Klonoff, D | |
Koehler, L | |
Korytkowski, M | |
Laine, DH | |
Le Devehat, C | |
Lervang, HH | |
Levinson, L | |
Lewin, A | |
Lilavivat, U | |
Lipetz, R | |
Lubin, B | |
Luedemann, J | |
Madsbad, S | |
Mäkelä, J | |
Marck, C | |
Matejek, N | |
Menéndez, E | |
Montanya, E | |
Milenkovic, T | |
Mira, R | |
Moberg, E | |
Musat, D | |
Nolan, J | |
Ollins, R | |
Ortiz-Carrasquillo, R | |
Osei, K | |
Peterson, G | |
Philippe, J | |
Pietri, A | |
Piletic, M | |
Polaszewska-Muszynska, M | |
Pollock, J | |
Prager, R | |
Radparvar, A | |
Ratcliff, L | |
Reed, J | |
Reeves, M | |
Rock, K | |
Rosenstock, J | |
Sall, K | |
Schabowski, J | |
Schernthaner, G | |
Schmidt, WE | |
Schwartz, S | |
Segiet, T | |
Serfer, G | |
Sieradzki, J | |
Smith, D | |
Søfteland, E | |
Solano, FV | |
Stasinska, T | |
Staut, M | |
Stearns, P | |
Stoll, M | |
Strand, J | |
Tamayo, R | |
Toplak, H | |
Townsend, R | |
Vaag, A | |
Vance, C | |
Wascher, T | |
Weinstein, R | |
Weiss, D | |
Wendisch, U | |
Wenzl-Bauer, V | |
Whittier, F | |
Wizemann, E |
Series
Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0140-6736
Access(Rights)
metadata.only