Publication:
Methods of Assessing Frailty in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6e6f5ebd-b73a-49ab-8711-3b009d99dd48
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidd58cad68-4b4b-4e12-950d-792d2f9c7e32
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidbfd599c8-3dc6-4e87-a38d-9ce3fcd9a58e
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid311a9b98-3628-478d-8fe5-101c249b4b0e
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidca7e7a85-9849-4d6b-943b-e94186920747
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorBertschi, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorWaskowski, Jan
dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorDonatsch, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorSchefold, Jörg Christian
dc.contributor.authorPfortmüller, Carmen
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T17:21:11Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T17:21:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-25
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION As new treatments have become established, more frail pre-ICU patients are being admitted to intensive care units (ICUs); this is creating new challenges to provide adequate care and to ensure that resources are allocated in an ethical and economical manner. This systematic review evaluates the current standard for assessing frailty on the ICU, including methods of assessment, time point of measurements, and cut-offs. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Randomized and non-randomized controlled studies were included that evaluated diagnostic tools and ICU outcomes for frailty. Exclusion criteria were the following: studies without baseline assessment of frailty on ICU admission, studies in paediatric patients or pregnant women, and studies that targeted very narrow populations of ICU patients. Eligible articles were included until January 31, 2021. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No meta-analysis was performed, due to heterogeneity. RESULTS N = 57 articles (253,376 patients) were included using 19 different methods to assess frailty or a surrogate. Frailty on ICU admission was most frequently detected using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) (n = 35, 60.3%), the Frailty Index (n = 5, 8.6%), and Fried's frailty phenotype (n = 6, 10.3%). N = 22 (37.9%) studies assessed functional status. Cut-offs, time points, and manner of baseline assessment of frailty on ICU admission varied widely. Frailty on ICU admission was associated with short- and long-term mortality, functional and cognitive impairment, increased health care dependency, and impaired quality of life post-ICU discharge. CONCLUSIONS Frailty assessment on the ICU is heterogeneous with respect to methods, cut-offs, and time points. The CFS may best reflect frailty in the ICU. Frailty assessments should be harmonized and performed routinely in the critically ill.
dc.description.numberOfPages29
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/168280
dc.identifier.pmid35339999
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1159/000523674
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/69492
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger
dc.relation.ispartofGerontology
dc.relation.issn0304-324X
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Intensive Care Medicine
dc.subjectAssessment Critical care Decision-making Frailty Geriatric medicine Outcome
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleMethods of Assessing Frailty in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage1349
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage1321
oaire.citation.volume68
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2022-03-29 07:52:04
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId168280
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleGERONTOLOGY
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
document.pdf
Size:
578.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
published

Collections