Publication:
Efficacy of clozapine versus second-generation antipsychotics in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3830-8508
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidae50baac-cf79-46c1-9c36-08d0c3e6b48b
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid2c3bb46b-4b44-4159-994f-c331ec73112d
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid46ab448c-3c6d-4a76-a22e-467343eb75ea
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorSchneider-Thoma, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorHamza, Tasnim
dc.contributor.authorChalkou, Konstantina
dc.contributor.authorSiafis, Spyridon
dc.contributor.authorDong, Shimeng
dc.contributor.authorBighelli, Irene
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Wulf-Peter
dc.contributor.authorScheuring, Elfriede
dc.contributor.authorDavis, John M
dc.contributor.authorPriller, Josef
dc.contributor.authorBaumann, Pierre
dc.contributor.authorConley, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCordes, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Deanna
dc.contributor.authorKluge, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKumra, Sanjiv
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Shôn
dc.contributor.authorMeltzer, Herbert Y
dc.contributor.authorNaber, Dieter
dc.contributor.authorSchooler, Nina
dc.contributor.authorVolavka, Jan
dc.contributor.authorWahlbeck, Kristian
dc.contributor.authorSalanti, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorLeucht, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T14:13:53Z
dc.date.available2025-03-27T14:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.descriptionSchneider-Thoma and Hamza share first authorship. Salanti and Leucht share last authorship (equal contributions).
dc.description.abstractBackground Clozapine is recommended by national and international guidelines for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, available meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials have not shown superior efficacy of clozapine when compared with other second-generation antipsychotics, with heterogeneity identified between the original studies. We aimed to use individual patient data (IPD) to account for potential reasons of variability and to synthesise an adjusted estimate for the difference in efficacy between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.Methods In this systematic review and IPD meta-analysis, we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register from inception to Jan 24, 2024, and previous reviews for blinded randomised controlled trials comparing clozapine with other second-generation antipsychotics in participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Trials were eligible if they included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and had a duration of at least 6 weeks. IPD were requested from trial investigators. The primary outcome was change in overall schizophrenia symptoms as measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics after 6-8 weeks of treatment. The effect size measure for the primary outcome was mean difference with 95% credible interval (CrI). We fitted a Bayesian random-effects IPD meta-regression model that included duration of illness, baseline severity, and sex as potential prognostic factors or treatment effect modifiers. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). People with lived experience of mental illness were involved in this study. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021254986.Findings We screened 13 876 references and included 19 studies with data for 1599 participants; IPD were available for 12 of 19 trials (n=1052; mean age 37·67 years [SD 11·24; range 10-66]; 348 [33·08%] women and 704 [66·92%] men). Data on ethnicity were not available. The estimated mean difference in change from baseline PANSS total score was -0·64 points (95% CrI -3·97 to 2·63; τ=2·68) in favour of other second-generation antipsychotics. Shorter duration of illness and higher baseline severity were prognostic factors associated with a larger reduction in symptoms, but neither those factors nor sex were found to modify the relative effect between clozapine and other second-generation antipsychotics. The confidence in the evidence was graded as very low.Interpretation This IPD meta-analysis found a small and uncertain advantage of other second-generation antipsychotics, mainly olanzapine and risperidone, and so did not provide evidence for superior efficacy of clozapine compared with other second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. It is limited by unavailability of IPD for some studies, uncaptured sources of variance, and uncertainty due to premature study discontinuation. Given the side-effects of clozapine, the observed uncertainty regarding clozapine's superiority warrants prudent use and further research.Funding German Ministry of Education and Research.
dc.description.numberOfPages12
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Clinical Research (DCR) - Statistics & Methodology (Heg)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM) - Evidence Synthesis Methods
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/86610
dc.identifier.pmid40023172
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00001-X
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/206064
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.fundingGerman Ministry for Education and Research = Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Psychiatry
dc.relation.issn2215-0374
dc.relation.issn2215-0366
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleEfficacy of clozapine versus second-generation antipsychotics in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage265
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage254
oaire.citation.volume12
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Research (DCR) - Statistics & Methodology (Heg)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM) - Evidence Synthesis Methods
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleLancet Psychiatry
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S221503662500001X-main.pdf
Size:
762.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections