Publication:
Sex differences in Outcome after Carotid Revascularization in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3fb65e8d-7af4-4dc2-9603-39bf4af7a15b
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorKremer, Christine
dc.contributor.authorLorenzano, Svetlana
dc.contributor.authorBejot, Yannick
dc.contributor.authorLal, Avtar
dc.contributor.authorEpple, Corina
dc.contributor.authorGdovinova, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorMono, Marie-Luise
dc.contributor.authorKarapanayiotides, Theodore
dc.contributor.authorJovanovic, Dejana
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Jesse
dc.contributor.authorCaso, Valeria
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-25T16:17:30Z
dc.date.available2024-10-25T16:17:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE Sex differences regarding the safety and efficacy of carotid revascularization in carotid artery stenosis have been addressed in several studies with conflicting results. Moreover, women are underrepresented in clinical trials leading to limited conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of acute stroke treatments. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by literature search including 4 databases from January 1985 to December 2021. Sex differences in the efficacy and safety of revascularization procedures, including carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses were analyzed. RESULTS Regarding carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, the stroke risk in men (3.6%) and women (3.9%) based on 99,495 patients (30 studies) did not differ (p=0.16). There was also no difference in the stroke risk by different time frames up to 10 years. Compared with men, women treated with CEA had a significantly higher stroke or death rate at 4 months (2 studies, 2565; 7.2% vs 5.0%; OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.12; I2=0%; p=0.03), and a significantly higher rate of restenosis (1 study, 615; 17.2% vs. 6.7%; OR 2.81,95% CI 1.66-4.75; p=0.0001). For carotid stenting (CAS) in symptomatic artery stenosis data showed a non-significant tendency toward higher peri-procedural stroke in women. Whereas, for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, data based on 332,344 patients showed that women compared to men after CEA had similar rates of stroke, stroke or death and the composite outcome stroke/death/myocardial infarction. The rate of restenosis at 1 year was significantly higher in women compared to men (1 study, 372 patients; 10.8% vs 3.2%; OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.49-9.2; p=0.005). Furthermore, carotid stenting in asymptomatic patients was associated with low risk of a postprocedural stroke in both sexes, but a significantly higher risk of in-hospital myocardial infarction in women than men (8445 patients, 1.2% vs. 0.6%, OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.23-3.28, I2=0%, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS A few sex-differences in short term outcomes after carotid revascularization for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were found, although there were no significant differences in the overall stroke. This indicates a need for larger multicenter prospective studies to evaluate these sex-specific differences. More women, including those aged over 80 years, need to be enrolled in RCTs, to better understand if sex differences exist and to tailor carotid revascularization accordingly.
dc.description.numberOfPages11
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Neurologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/181725
dc.identifier.pmid37055001
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.502
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/166463
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of vascular surgery
dc.relation.issn0741-5214
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Neurology
dc.subjectcarotid endarterectomy carotid stenting ischemic stroke outcome sex differences
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleSex differences in Outcome after Carotid Revascularization in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage827.e10
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage817
oaire.citation.volume78
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Neurologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2023-04-18 13:28:01
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId181725
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleJ VASC SURG
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0741521423010285-main.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
accepted

Collections