Prospective evaluation of the capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index in systemic sclerosis patients in clinical practice: a longitudinal, multicentre study.
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
30359309
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is an important tool for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI) was suggested to identify patients at risk of developing digital ulcers (DUs). This study aims to assess the reliability of the CSURI across assessors, the CSURI change during follow-up and the value of the CSURI in predicting new DUs.
METHODS
This multicentre, longitudinal study included SSc patients with a history of DUs. NC images of all eight fingers were obtained at baseline and follow-up and were separately analysed by two trained assessors.
RESULTS
Sixty-one patients were included (median observation time 1.0 year). In about 40% of patients (assessor 1, n = 24, 39%; assessor 2, n = 26, 43%) no megacapillary was detected in any of the baseline or follow-up images; hence the CSURI could not be calculated. In those 34 patients in whom CSURI scores were available from both assessors (26% male; median age 57 years) the median baseline CSURI was 5.3 according to assessor 1 (IQR 2.6-16.3), increasing to 5.9 (IQR 1.3-12.0) at follow-up. According to assessor 2, the CSURI diminished from 6.4 (IQR 2.4-12.5) to 5.0 (IQR 1.7-10.0). The ability of a CSURI ≥ 2.96 category to predict new DUs was low (for both assessors, positive predictive value 38% and negative predictive value 50%) and the inter-assessor agreements for CSURI categories were fair to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, around 40% of patients could not be evaluated with the CSURI due to the absence of megacapillaries. Clinical decisions based on the CSURI should be made with caution.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN04371709 . Registered on 18 March 2011.
Nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) is an important tool for the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index (CSURI) was suggested to identify patients at risk of developing digital ulcers (DUs). This study aims to assess the reliability of the CSURI across assessors, the CSURI change during follow-up and the value of the CSURI in predicting new DUs.
METHODS
This multicentre, longitudinal study included SSc patients with a history of DUs. NC images of all eight fingers were obtained at baseline and follow-up and were separately analysed by two trained assessors.
RESULTS
Sixty-one patients were included (median observation time 1.0 year). In about 40% of patients (assessor 1, n = 24, 39%; assessor 2, n = 26, 43%) no megacapillary was detected in any of the baseline or follow-up images; hence the CSURI could not be calculated. In those 34 patients in whom CSURI scores were available from both assessors (26% male; median age 57 years) the median baseline CSURI was 5.3 according to assessor 1 (IQR 2.6-16.3), increasing to 5.9 (IQR 1.3-12.0) at follow-up. According to assessor 2, the CSURI diminished from 6.4 (IQR 2.4-12.5) to 5.0 (IQR 1.7-10.0). The ability of a CSURI ≥ 2.96 category to predict new DUs was low (for both assessors, positive predictive value 38% and negative predictive value 50%) and the inter-assessor agreements for CSURI categories were fair to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, around 40% of patients could not be evaluated with the CSURI due to the absence of megacapillaries. Clinical decisions based on the CSURI should be made with caution.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN04371709 . Registered on 18 March 2011.
Date Issued
2018-10-25
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Subjects
Capillaroscopic skin ulcer risk index Digital ulcer prediction Inter-rater reliability Nailfold capillaroscopy Systemic sclerosis
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Walker, Ulrich A | |
Jaeger, Veronika K | |
Bruppacher, Katharina M | |
Dobrota, Rucsandra | |
Arlettaz, Lionel | |
Banyai, Martin | |
Beron, Jörg | |
Chizzolini, Carlo | |
Groechenig, Ernst | |
Mueller, Rüdiger B | |
Spertini, François | |
Distler, Oliver |
Additional Credits
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
Publisher
BioMed Central
ISSN
1478-6354
Access(Rights)
open.access