Publication:
Comparison of the effect of a CIDR-Select synch versus a long-term CIDR based AI protocol on reproductive performance in multiparous dairy cows in Swiss dairy farms

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-2415-3768
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid576e1b0c-6ec0-412f-b7a1-25842ad408eb
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid1f8ff677-887d-4e9c-9f09-288b622c481c
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid83851067-ac83-4e77-a17c-1b003d178f9b
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid26fe2e90-0926-47bc-9609-97f99d6cf5d2
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidf61cab69-e4ec-43e4-a940-b16036f2d7fe
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorRudolph, Jürn
dc.contributor.authorBruckmaier, Rupert
dc.contributor.authorKasimanickam, Ramanathan
dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Adrian
dc.contributor.authorKirchhofer, Marc Peter
dc.contributor.authorHüsler, Jürg
dc.contributor.authorHirsbrunner, Gabriela
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-11T09:34:57Z
dc.date.available2024-10-11T09:34:57Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground Synchronization programs have become standard in the dairy industry in many countries. In Switzerland, these programs are not routinely used for groups of cows, but predominantly as a therapy for individual problem cows. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of a CIDR-Select Synch and a 12-d CIDR protocol on the pregnancy rate in healthy, multiparous dairy cows in Swiss dairy farms. Methods Cows (N = 508) were randomly assigned to CIDR-Select Synch (N = 262) or 12-d CIDR (N = 246) protocols. Cows in the CIDR-Select Synch group received a CIDR and 2.5 ml of buserelin i.m. on d 0. On d 7, the CIDR insert was removed and 5 ml of dinoprost was administered i.m.. Cows in the 12-d CIDR group received the CIDR on d 0 and it was removed on d 12 (the routine CIDR protocol in Swiss dairies). On d 0 a milk sample for progesterone analysis was taken. Cows were inseminated upon observed estrus. Pregnancy was determined at or more than 35 days after artificial insemination. As a first step, the two groups were compared as to indication for treatment, breed, stud book, stall, pasture, and farmer's business using chi square tests or Fisher's exact test. Furthermore, groups were compared as to age, DIM, number of AI's, number of cows per farm, and yearly milk yield per cow using nonparametric ANOVA. A multiple logistic model was used to relate the success of the protocols to all of the available factors; in particular treatment (CIDR-Select Synch/12-d CIDR), milk progesterone value, age, DIM, previous treatment of the uterus, previous gynecological treatment, and number of preceding inseminations. Results The pregnancy rate was higher in cows following the CIDR-Select Synch compared to the 12-d CIDR protocol (50.4% vs. 22.4%; P < 0.0001). Conclusion The CIDR-Select Synch protocol may be highly recommended for multiparous dairy cows. The reduced time span of the progesterone insert decreased the number of days open, improved the pregnancy rate compared to the 12-d CIDR protocol and the cows did not to have to be handled more often.
dc.description.numberOfPages6
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Mathematische Statistik und Versicherungslehre (IMSV)
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Wiederkäuerklinik
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Veterinär-Physiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.8545
dc.identifier.isi000299105100001
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/1477-7827-9-151
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/78963
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.publisher.placeLondon
dc.relation.ispartofReproductive biology and endocrinology
dc.relation.issn1477-7827
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C032E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C0BCE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C025E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::630 - Agriculture
dc.titleComparison of the effect of a CIDR-Select synch versus a long-term CIDR based AI protocol on reproductive performance in multiparous dairy cows in Swiss dairy farms
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage151
oaire.citation.volume9
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Veterinär-Physiologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartement klinische Veterinärmedizin, Wiederkäuerklinik
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Wiederkäuerklinik
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Mathematische Statistik und Versicherungslehre (IMSV)
oairecerif.author.affiliationDepartement für klinische Veterinärmedizin, Wiederkäuerklinik
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId8545
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleREPROD BIOL ENDOCRIN
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1477-7827-9-151.pdf
Size:
286.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections