• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Evidence-based risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Predictive and Diagnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease.

Evidence-based risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Predictive and Diagnostic Variables in Thrombotic Disease.

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/93027
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.jtha.2025.10.036
PubMed ID
41354154
Abstract
Background
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) includes clinical presentations with a wide spectrum of severities, making risk stratification essential to guide the decision-making process in daily practice. However, international guidelines differ in definition of risk classes and consequent treatment recommendations.Objective
To summarize high quality evidence supporting four key management decisions in acute PE: hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, reperfusion therapy and discharge.Methods
A multidisciplinary ISTH taskforce completed with international experts conducted a literature review focused on randomized trials and prospective management studies reporting hard clinical outcomes and assessed as having a low risk of bias, focused on any of the 4 management decisions detailed above.Results And Conclusions
Available evidence supports the use of either the Hestia criteria or (s)PESI combined with clinical judgment to select PE patients for outpatient treatment. In contrast, no PE-specific evidence exists to guide ICU admission. Reperfusion therapy in hemodynamically unstable patients is supported by one small, randomized trial, while currently available high-quality evidence does not support routine reperfusion therapy in hemodynamically stable patients; therefore, hemodynamic instability remains the only established indication for reperfusion therapy to date. The decision to discharge a PE patient may be supported by the use of sPESI combined with clinical assessment of stability. All in all, substantial evidence gaps persist, underscoring the need for further research to inform clinical practice and future guidelines.
Date Issued
2026-03
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Subjects
acute pulmonary embolism
•
risk assessment tool
•
risk stratification
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Talerico, Rosa
de Wit, Kerstin
Barco, Stefano
Bonorino, Jose
den Uil, Corstiaan
Kraemer, Carlos Elzo
Germini, Federico
Iding, Aaron
Jones, Aubrey
Konstantinides, Stavros
Masias, Camila
Parks, Anna L
Robert-Ebadi, Helia
Tritschler, Tobias  
Clinic of General Internal Medicine  
Vedovati, Maria Cristina
Vinson, David R
Woller, Scott C
Klok, Frederikus A
Additional Credits
Clinic of General Internal Medicine  
Journal
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1538-7836
1538-7933
Access(Rights)
embargo
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify