Who threw that stone? A study on DNA transfer.
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39442240
Abstract
Contact or touch DNA traces from stones account for around 5 % of all crime scene-related swab samples analysed in our department. These traces are often used to identify perpetrators in cases such as burglary, when a stone is used as a tool to break a window or in cases of property damage during riots. Provided that a DNA profile can be obtained in such a case, questions may arise in court regarding the possibilities of DNA transfer onto the stone. Was the subject's DNA indeed transferred onto the stone while it was being used for the crime, or was it already present as background DNA? Alternatively, could it have been transferred by other means, such as by handing over the stone to someone else who then threw it, or by touching it during an attempt to prevent someone else from throwing it? This study focused on two scenarios: experiments involving different participants throwing various stones and a handover scenario where one person touched the stone and another person threw it. We observed that the amount of DNA transferred/detected on the stone is mainly dependent on the individual handling it rather than on the properties of the stone itself or on the order in which the stones are thrown. In the handover scenario, the person who first touched the stone was found to be the main contributor to the trace as often as the person who eventually threw the stone. Our findings therefore confirm that no conclusions can be drawn about the way of interaction with the stones based solely on the obtained DNA profiles.
Date Issued
2025-01
Publication Type
Article
Subjects
Burglary
•
DNA transfer and persistence
•
Riot
•
Stone
•
Touch DNA
Language(s)
en
Journal
Forensic Science International: Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1872-4973
Access(Rights)
Unknown