Publication:
Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4556e057-c3b2-4a7d-ab61-3bb9c7dbc233
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, A
dc.contributor.authorTogno, M
dc.contributor.authorBallesteros-Zebadua, P
dc.contributor.authorFranco-Perez, J
dc.contributor.authorGeyer, R
dc.contributor.authorSchaefer, R
dc.contributor.authorPetit, B
dc.contributor.authorGrilj, V
dc.contributor.authorMeer, D
dc.contributor.authorSafai, S
dc.contributor.authorLomax, T
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Damien Charles
dc.contributor.authorBailat, C
dc.contributor.authorPsoroulas, S
dc.contributor.authorVozenin, M C
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-24T08:53:01Z
dc.date.available2024-11-24T08:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The FLASH effect has been validated in different preclinical experiments with electrons (eFLASH) and protons (pFLASH) operating at an average dose rate above 40 Gy/s. However, no systematic intercomparison of the FLASH effect produced by eFLASHvs. pFLASH has yet been performed and constitutes the aim of the present study. MATERIALS AND METHODS The electron eRT6/Oriatron/CHUV/5.5 MeV and proton Gantry1/PSI/170 MeV were used to deliver conventional (0.1 Gy/s eCONV and pCONV) and FLASH (≥110 Gy/s eFLASH and pFLASH) dose rates. Protons were delivered in transmission. Dosimetric and biologic intercomparisons were performed using previously validated dosimetric approaches and experimental murine models. RESULTS The difference between the average absorbed dose measured at Gantry 1 with PSI reference dosimeters and with CHUV/IRA dosimeters was -1.9 % (0.1 Gy/s) and +2.5 % (110 Gy/s). The neurocognitive capacity of eFLASH and pFLASH irradiated mice was indistinguishable from the control, while both eCONV and pCONV irradiated cohorts showed cognitive decrements. Complete tumor response was obtained after an ablative dose of 20 Gy delivered with the two beams at CONV and FLASH dose rates. Tumor rejection upon rechallenge indicates that anti-tumor immunity was activated independently of the beam-type and the dose-rate. CONCLUSION Despite major differences in the temporal microstructure of proton and electron beams, this study shows that dosimetric standards can be established. Normal brain protection and tumor control were produced by the two beams. More specifically, normal brain protection was achieved when a single dose of 10 Gy was delivered in 90 milliseconds or less, suggesting that the most important physical parameter driving the FLASH sparing effect might be the mean dose rate. In addition, a systemic anti-tumor immunological memory response was observed in mice exposed to high ablative dose of electron and proton delivered at CONV and FLASH dose rate.
dc.description.sponsorshipPaul Scherrer Institut
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/187209
dc.identifier.pmid37839557
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109953
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/190610
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Scientific Publ. Ireland
dc.relation.ispartofRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
dc.relation.issn1879-0887
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BAD6E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleDosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue109953
oaire.citation.startPage109953
oaire.citation.volume190
oairecerif.author.affiliationPaul Scherrer Institut
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Universitätsklinik für Radio-Onkologie
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2023-10-17 08:39:38
unibe.date.licenseChanged2023-10-18 01:19:07
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId187209
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleRadiother Oncol
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S0167814023898474-main.pdf
Size:
2.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
accepted

Collections