• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Comparison of Four Commercial IgG-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibodies.

Comparison of Four Commercial IgG-Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for the Detection of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Antibodies.

Details
Files
DOI
10.7892/boris.123342
Official URL
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/vbz.2018.2359
Publisher DOI
10.1089/vbz.2018.2359
PubMed ID
30523740
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is the most important arboviral disease in many parts of Europe and Asia. Both the diagnosis of TBE as well as the conduction of surveillance studies are based on the demonstration of specific antibodies. For reasons of simplicity, automatization, and quick availability of test results, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are the method of choice for anti-TBE virus antibody detection. In this study, we evaluated four commercial IgG-ELISAs using 876 epidemiological plasma samples: the Enzygnost Anti-TBE/FSME Virus IgG assay (Siemens; assay 1), the Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA (IgG) assay (Euroimmun; assay 2), the Anti-FSME/TBE Virus ELISA "Vienna" (IgG) assay (Euroimmun; assay 3), and the RIDASCREEN FSME/TBE IgG EIA assay (R-Biopharm; assay 4). In total, discrepant results were observed for 37.2% of all samples. The evaluated assays significantly differed in qualitative data (p < 0.0001, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test) and showed Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ranging between 0.88 and 0.97 for quantitative data. The degree of disagreement between the different assays was exceptionally high for samples originating from blood donors with vaccination against TBE virus. For this sample group, the proportion of positive results was considerably higher for assay 3 (52.7%) and assay 4 (57%) than for assay 1 (7.5%) and assay 2 (6.4%), respectively, indicating that assays 1 and 2 are less suitable for the detection of vaccination antibodies than assays 3 and 4. Indirect immunofluorescence testing data available for a subset of samples (n = 238) mostly originating from nonflavivirus-vaccinated blood donors (n = 234) revealed problems in both sensitivity and specificity of the evaluated assays; whereas sensitivity issues were most prominent for the Euroimmun assay, specificity concerns were most pronounced for the Euroimmun Vienna and the RIDASCREEN assays.
Date Issued
2019-05
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
500 Science > 570 Life sciences; biology
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Subjects
ELISA tick-borne encephalitis virus
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Ackermann-Gäumann, Rahel
Eyer, Claudia
Leib, Stephen  orcid-logo
Institut für Infektionskrankheiten  
Institut für Infektionskrankheiten  
Niederhauser-Lüthi, Christoph Peter  
Institut für Infektionskrankheiten, Forschung  
Additional Credits
Institut für Infektionskrankheiten  
Institut für Infektionskrankheiten, Forschung  
Journal
Vector borne and zoonotic diseases
Publisher
Mary Ann Liebert
ISSN
1557-7759
Access(Rights)
restricted
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: c618d0 [ 2.10. 13:10]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify