• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. A cross-sectional study of policies from American medical organizations about public communications from physicians in the digital age

A cross-sectional study of policies from American medical organizations about public communications from physicians in the digital age

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/78637
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-81176-6
PubMed ID
39609590
Abstract
As a professional duty, physicians are often required to publicly comment on health-related topics. However, ethical complexities can arise during discussions about high-profile individuals or events, especially in an era of rapid news cycles and digital media. The American Medical Association (AMA) has policies concerning physician commentary and media interactions, as does the American Psychiatric Association (i.e., the Goldwater Rule). Nevertheless, the extent to which other United States medical associations have adopted similar protocols remains underexplored. Focusing on non-psychiatric members of the AMA's policymaking body, the Federation of Medicine (FMMs), this study sought to analyze cross-speciality perspectives. Between January-March 2024, online resources for N = 122 FMMs were reviewed (e.g., professional codes and position statements), followed by email outreach to verify positions and garner further insights. n = 47 FMMs provided sufficient information for inclusion, cumulatively representing approximately 950,000 members. n = 16 FMMs (34%) had guidelines or policies regarding public commentary, generally emphasizing accuracy, consent, and confidentiality. Yet, for the majority of FMMs (n = 31/66%), no specific regulations were identified; these organizations did not cite any proprietary statutes or deferred to AMA materials. Moreover, existing FMM policies largely overlooked the impact of Artificial Intelligence and digital misinformation, warranting cross-specialty exchanges to uphold credible discourse amid societal and technological shifts.
Date Issued
2024-11-28
Publication Type
Article
Subjects
American Medical Association
•
Artificial intelligence
•
Goldwater Rule
•
Medical ethics
•
Misinformation
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Smith, Alexander J.  
Forensic Psychiatric Service  
Forensisch-Psychiatrischer Dienst (FPD) - Forschung  
Hachen, Stefanie  
Forensic Psychiatric Service  
Oquendo, Maria A.
Bhugra, Dinesh
Ventriglio, Antonio
Liebrenz, Michael  
Institute of Forensic Medicine  
Forensic Psychiatric Service  
Forensic Psychiatric Service  
Additional Credits
Forensic Psychiatric Service  
Forensisch-Psychiatrischer Dienst (FPD) - Forschung  
Institute of Forensic Medicine  
Journal
Scientific Reports
Publisher
Nature Research
ISSN
2045-2322
Access(Rights)
Unknown
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify