Three-Year Practice-Based Clinical Trial on the Performance of a Self-Adhesive Resin-Based Bulk-Fill Restorative.
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
40151054
Abstract
Objective
The prospective clinical study followed up on self-adhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorations.Materials And Methods
Seven general dental practitioners from a practice-based research network filled 60 cavities (20 Class I, 19 Class II, 21 Class V) in permanent vital teeth of 41 subjects with a self-adhesive, dual-curing composite hybrid (Surefil one). Modified USPHS criteria were evaluated at baseline and annually. Replacement or repair of the restoration was defined as failure. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and non-parametrically (p < 0.05).Results
After 3 years (1118 ± 39 days), all 29 recalled teeth were rated as vital with no hypersensitivity. One tooth showed signs of cracking. One Class I and one Class II restoration failed due to a combined marginal gap and chipping. Two restorations showed a color mismatch. The remaining restorations were found to be in clinically acceptable condition and all Class II restorations in proximal contact maintained proper contact. With one restoration failure reported after 1 year, the total of three failures resulted in an annual failure rate of 3.94%.Conclusions
The self-adhesive composite hybrid placed during daily routine showed acceptable results out to 3 years in load-bearing Classes I and II as well as non-retentive Class V cavities.Clinical Significance
Three-year data confirmed the suitability of the novel self-adhesive restorative material for stress-bearing posterior restorations.
The prospective clinical study followed up on self-adhesive resin-based bulk-fill restorations.Materials And Methods
Seven general dental practitioners from a practice-based research network filled 60 cavities (20 Class I, 19 Class II, 21 Class V) in permanent vital teeth of 41 subjects with a self-adhesive, dual-curing composite hybrid (Surefil one). Modified USPHS criteria were evaluated at baseline and annually. Replacement or repair of the restoration was defined as failure. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and non-parametrically (p < 0.05).Results
After 3 years (1118 ± 39 days), all 29 recalled teeth were rated as vital with no hypersensitivity. One tooth showed signs of cracking. One Class I and one Class II restoration failed due to a combined marginal gap and chipping. Two restorations showed a color mismatch. The remaining restorations were found to be in clinically acceptable condition and all Class II restorations in proximal contact maintained proper contact. With one restoration failure reported after 1 year, the total of three failures resulted in an annual failure rate of 3.94%.Conclusions
The self-adhesive composite hybrid placed during daily routine showed acceptable results out to 3 years in load-bearing Classes I and II as well as non-retentive Class V cavities.Clinical Significance
Three-year data confirmed the suitability of the novel self-adhesive restorative material for stress-bearing posterior restorations.
Date Issued
2025-07
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Subjects
bulk‐fill
•
clinical trial
•
composite hybrid
•
dual‐cure
•
practice‐based research
•
self‐adhesive
•
survival
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Rathke, Andreas | |
Pfefferkorn, Frank | |
McGuire, Michael Kent | |
Heard, Rick H | |
Åström, Mikael |
Journal
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1708-8240
1496-4155
Access(Rights)
open.access