• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG)

Application and comparison of classification algorithms for recognition of Alzheimer's disease in electrical brain activity (EEG)

Details
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.023
PubMed ID
17156848
Abstract
The early detection of subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for effective appliance of treatment strategies. Here we explored the ability of a multitude of linear and non-linear classification algorithms to discriminate between the electroencephalograms (EEGs) of patients with varying degree of AD and their age-matched control subjects. Absolute and relative spectral power, distribution of spectral power, and measures of spatial synchronization were calculated from recordings of resting eyes-closed continuous EEGs of 45 healthy controls, 116 patients with mild AD and 81 patients with moderate AD, recruited in two different centers (Stockholm, New York). The applied classification algorithms were: principal component linear discriminant analysis (PC LDA), partial least squares LDA (PLS LDA), principal component logistic regression (PC LR), partial least squares logistic regression (PLS LR), bagging, random forest, support vector machines (SVM) and feed-forward neural network. Based on 10-fold cross-validation runs it could be demonstrated that even tough modern computer-intensive classification algorithms such as random forests, SVM and neural networks show a slight superiority, more classical classification algorithms performed nearly equally well. Using random forests classification a considerable sensitivity of up to 85% and a specificity of 78%, respectively for the test of even only mild AD patients has been reached, whereas for the comparison of moderate AD vs. controls, using SVM and neural networks, values of 89% and 88% for sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Such a remarkable performance proves the value of these classification algorithms for clinical diagnostics.
Date Issued
2007
Publication Type
Article
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Lehmann, Christoph  
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Neurophysiologie  
König, Thomas  
Institut für Psychologie, Allgemeine Psychologie und Neuropsychologie  
Jelic, Vesna
Prichep, Leslie
John, Roy E
Wahlund, Lars-Olof
Dodge, Yadolah
Dierks, Thomas  
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Neurophysiologie  
Additional Credits
Institut für Psychologie, Allgemeine Psychologie und Neuropsychologie  
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie, Psychiatrische Neurophysiologie  
Journal
Journal of neuroscience methods
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0165-0270
Access(Rights)
metadata.only
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 0eaa7c [ 7.08. 11:06]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify