• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Collections
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Fragility Index analysis for robustness of evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for rectal cancer.

Fragility Index analysis for robustness of evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for rectal cancer.

Details
Files
DOI
10.48620/89387
Publisher DOI
10.1002/ijc.35521
PubMed ID
40546050
Abstract
Robustness of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is crucial for guiding clinical decisions in rectal cancer. We evaluated the reliability of RCTs cited by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for rectal cancer using the Fragility Index (FI) that quantifies the stability of trial outcomes. RCTs referenced in the latest NCCN guidelines for rectal cancer were reviewed. Data from eligible trials were extracted. FI was calculated to assess the robustness of evidence across different treatment modalities. Sixty-seven RCTs (published: 1987-2022) involving 16,990 patients were analyzed. Most studies (58.2%) were conducted in Europe. Common treatment areas included metastatic liver disease (28.9%) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (14.9%). Primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) in 15 studies each (22.4%), local recurrence rates in 6 (9%), and tumor response in 5 (7.5%). The median FI was 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-20). Studies on surgical interventions had the highest median FI (21 [IQR 7-27]) followed by studies on neoadjuvant radiotherapy (19 [IQR 14-25]). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies had the lowest median FI of 0, indicating less robust evidence. Notably, surgical intervention studies showed the largest gap between FI and patients lost to follow-up (21 vs. 13.5), while neoadjuvant immunotherapy studies showed more patients lost to follow-up than the median FI (0 vs. 5), highlighting the need for stronger evidence. In conclusion, evidence supporting most treatments for rectal cancer in the NCCN guidelines is robust, although neoadjuvant immunotherapy requires further scrutiny due to its low FI. FI offers a nuanced perspective on the reliability of trial outcomes.
Date Issued
2025-11-01
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 Technology > 610 Medicine & health
Subjects
immunotherapy
•
rectal cancer
•
surgery
•
survival
Language(s)
en
Author(s)
Horesh, Nir
Dourado, Justin
Rogers, Peter
Aeschbacher, Pauline  
Clinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine  
Garoufalia, Zoe
Gefen, Rachel
Salama, Ebram
Emile, Sameh Hany
Wexner, Steven D
Additional Credits
Clinic of Visceral Surgery and Medicine  
Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1097-0215
0020-7136
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 24f0a9 [ 4.09. 8:55]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
  • Events
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • BORIS Portal & Open Science
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo
Repository logo COAR Notify